
The Great Vermont Flood of 1927: What Happened and Where You Can Still See It Today
There’s a stretch of Route 2 through Bolton where the Winooski River squeezes in tight against the road, and on a gray November afternoon, after a few days of cold rain, it runs the color of strong tea. I slow down there every time. Not because the road is bad, but because I know what this river did on a November night almost a century ago, and the water still has that same restless look when it’s running high.
The Great Vermont Flood of 1927 is a big part of why central Vermont looks the way it does. It rewrote riverbanks, took out more than a thousand bridges, and killed 84 Vermonters in about a day and a half. It’s also the yardstick every flood since gets measured against, including Irene in 2011 and the July 2023 flood that put Montpelier underwater again.
If you live here, you’ve probably heard an older neighbor mention “the ’27 flood” like it happened a few winters back. If you’re visiting in stick season, you’ve likely driven right past its traces without knowing it. Here’s what actually happened, why it was so devastating, and where you can still see it on the landscape.
What happened in the Great Vermont Flood of 1927?
The rain started around 10 p.m. on November 2, 1927, and didn’t quit until late morning on November 4. On paper that doesn’t sound unusual. Vermont gets long, soaking rains every fall. But this storm carried tropical moisture up the coast and ran into another system moving across the country, and when all that warm, wet air hit the Green Mountains it was forced upward and wrung out over the state.
The worst of it came on the afternoon and evening of November 3, when parts of the state saw more than seven inches fall in roughly six hours. Somerset, high in the southern Green Mountains, recorded the biggest total at 9.68 inches. Most of Vermont landed somewhere between four and nine inches over the whole storm.
Merchants in Barre noticed water seeping into their basements around midday. By that night, the Winooski was rising about four feet an hour at its peak, and people living along it had minutes, not hours, to get out.
Why was the 1927 flood so bad in Vermont?
Timing did most of the damage. The fall of 1927 had already been unusually wet, so by early November the ground was saturated and the brooks were running full. The new rain had nowhere to go except straight downhill into rivers that were already near their banks.
Then there’s geography, which anyone who drives central Vermont understands in their gut. Our towns grew up along rivers because rivers powered the mills. Barre, Montpelier, Waterbury, Bolton, and Winooski are all strung along the same water, so when the Winooski rose, it rose through every one of them.
And in 1927 there was nothing upstream to slow it down. No flood control dams, no reservoirs built to hold back a surge. Just narrow valleys, old mill dams, and far more water than any of them could handle.

How many people died in the 1927 Vermont flood?
Eighty-four Vermonters died, which still makes it the deadliest natural disaster in state history. Fifty-five of those deaths were in the Winooski River basin alone. Around 9,000 people were left homeless, 1,285 bridges were lost, and the damage came to roughly $30 million in 1927 dollars.
The lieutenant governor in Barre
Among the dead was Vermont’s sitting lieutenant governor, S. Hollister Jackson of Barre. On the night of November 3 he tried to leap across what looked like a narrow rivulet of runoff. The ground beside it had been undercut by the water, and it collapsed as he jumped. He fell into the current and drowned, one of seven people lost in Barre.
The boardinghouse in Bolton
Bolton took one of the cruelest blows. When a dam gave way, the surge carried off a boardinghouse full of people. Nineteen died there, including Jennie Dupree Hayes, who ran the place, her daughter, her granddaughter, and sixteen men staying with her, many of them railroad workers.
When I drive through Bolton now, past the farm fields and the long views toward Camel’s Hump, it’s hard to picture. The valley is so quiet most of the year. Maybe that’s why the story stays with you.
Waterbury and Montpelier
About 20 people died in Waterbury, where the water stood around 18 feet high on Main Street. In Montpelier, the Winooski crested at 27.1 feet on the river gauge, and much of downtown sat under 8 to 10 feet of water. Photos from the Vermont Historical Society show men on a homemade raft drifting through the intersection of East State and Main early on November 4, with water up to the storefront windows.
The next day, the State House lawn was littered with lumber and wreckage. If you’ve ever read about why Montpelier became Vermont’s capital in the first place, it’s a striking picture: the seat of state government, buried in debris that floated down from upriver.
How did Vermont recover from the 1927 flood?
Vermonters started digging out before the rain had fully stopped. In downtown Barre, crews used hoses and buckets to clear mud from basements and first floors. Roads and rail lines were so torn up that some places could only be reached by air for a while. If you’ve read about the rise and fall of Vermont’s railroads, 1927 is one of the big turning points, with miles of track gone in a single night.
Governor John Weeks called the White House and asked President Coolidge, a Vermonter himself, to send help. Coolidge sent Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover, who toured the wreckage and said he’d seen “Vermont at her worst, but Vermonters at their best.” That line still gets repeated every time the rivers come up.
In late November, the legislature met in a special session and approved an $8.5 million bond for rebuilding, paid back through a flood tax. Congress added federal relief money, and the Red Cross sent hundreds of thousands of dollars more.
Rebuilding the bridges
With 1,285 bridges gone, Vermont had to rebuild its road network almost from scratch. A lot of what washed away was wood, and a lot of what replaced it was steel and concrete. It’s one reason the older spans that made it through feel so precious now. When you go looking for Vermont’s covered bridges, the older ones are survivors in more ways than one.
The dams the CCC built
The long-term fix came during the Depression. Through the Civilian Conservation Corps, with the Army Corps of Engineers overseeing the work, three flood control dams went up on Winooski tributaries: East Barre, Wrightsville just north of Montpelier, and Waterbury. CCC crews also rebuilt the old clothespin factory dam in Montpelier and cleared the river channel through the gorge at Middlesex.
Waterbury was the big one. More than 2,000 men worked on it, many of them World War I veterans, and when it was finished in 1938 it was the largest earth-filled dam east of the Mississippi. Today the reservoir behind it is where a lot of us paddle and swim in summer, and most people floating there on a hot July afternoon have no idea it exists because of a November night in 1927.
Where can you see traces of the 1927 flood in Vermont today?
Once you know what to look for, the flood shows up all over central Vermont. A few places worth seeking out:
- The high water plaque in Waterbury. Mounted on the side of a downtown building, the 1927 marker sits roughly 15 feet above today’s ground, about 10 feet above the marker for Irene in 2011. Standing underneath it is humbling.
- Waterbury Dam and Reservoir. The most visible legacy of the flood, with state park land around the shoreline that makes for a quiet stick-season walk.
- Wrightsville Reservoir. Just north of Montpelier, this is the dam engineers watched closely during the July 2023 flood. It held.
- The Vermont Historical Society in Barre. Its library holds a deep collection of 1927 flood photographs, and many of them can be browsed online through Digital Vermont.
- Route 2 between Waterbury and Bolton. Drive it slowly and notice how close the river runs to the road. It explains the whole story without a single sign.
How does the 1927 flood compare to Irene and the 2023 flood?
Every big flood here gets compared to 1927, and none has matched it for loss of life. Irene in 2011 tore apart roads and towns across the southern and central parts of the state, but the 1927 high water marks still sit well above Irene’s in places like Waterbury.
In July 2023, the Winooski crested just over 21 feet in Montpelier, the highest since 1927 but still about six feet below that record. Downtown flooded again, shops on State and Main had to rebuild again, and neighbors showed up with shovels and pumps again. To a lot of us, it felt like Hoover’s line playing out a second time.
The dams built after 1927 did their job in 2023, but they also showed their age. There’s an ongoing conversation now about whether flood control designed in the 1930s can keep up with storms that seem to arrive more often.
That might be the real legacy of 1927. It isn’t just a set of old photographs in an archive. It’s the number people check the river gauge against, and the reason so many Vermonters get a little quiet when a November rain won’t let up.
The brooks up in the hills usually run clear again by morning, but down in the valleys, the river remembers exactly how high it has been.
Shop Green Mountain Peaks on Etsy
Bring a little piece of Vermont into your home with our curated collection of gifts, apparel, and seasonal favorites. From cozy hoodies and crewnecks to Vermont-themed gift boxes and cookbooks, each item is designed to celebrate the Green Mountain spirit.
- Vermont-inspired designs and gift sets
- Printed and packaged with care
- Ships directly to your door
Discover gifts, apparel, and Vermont treasures made to share and enjoy year-round.

















